Live
โœฆ SportSignals+ just now
Value SmartBetsNEW Props Predictions Live My Bets Alerts
Serie A ยท MW4Ref: Luca Pairetto
Full time

Inter 5-3 Udinese result, stats and report

Inter
Won ยท xG 2.83
5 โ€“ 3
FT
Lost ยท xG 0.76
Udinese
Next: AS Roma v Inter ยท Sat 19 Sept ยท Udinese v Cagliari ยท Sat 19 Sept
Skip match sections
Match report

Inter 5-3 Udinese: Controlled Destruction With a Sloppy Finish

SportSignals Match Desk ยท Football analysis desk ยท

Inter won. Five goals, three points, job done. That is the headline. But we are not just going to sit here and clap because the scoreboard says 5-3 and move on. Three goals conceded against Udinese. Three. Against a side that had lost three of their last five Serie A matches coming into this one. That is not a footnote. That is a problem, and someone needs to say it plainly.

The Basics Were There. Until They Weren't.

Let me be clear about what Inter did well, because there was plenty. They controlled this match from start to finish. Sixty-six percent possession. Six hundred and thirty-eight passes at a ninety-three percent completion rate. Twenty-seven shots to Udinese's six. One hundred and eleven attacks to forty-nine. Sixty-eight dangerous attacks to seventeen. Inter were not just better. They were in a different match.

The goals came from all over the pitch, which is a credit to the desire Inter showed to get forward. Carlos Augusto got one. Nicolรฒ Barella got one, assisted by Marcus Thuram. Thuram scored himself after the break. Pio Esposito came off the bench and added a fourth. Ange-Yoan Bonny, also a substitute, wrapped it up with the fifth. That is five different scorers. That is an attacking unit that wants to compete, that has the attitude to keep going even when the game is already in hand. I respect that.

The thing is, eight big chances created tells you this side knows how to hurt teams. Eighteen key passes. Six accurate crosses from twenty-one attempted. The intent was there all night.

But What Was That Defensively?

Listen, I don't need a laptop to see what happened here. Udinese scored three goals with six total shots. Three goals from six shots. Let that sit with you for a moment.

James Abankwah headed one in at nine minutes. Jurgen Ekkelenkamp added a second at sixteen. Within sixteen minutes, Udinese had two goals from their first real moments of threat. Inter then pulled it back to two apiece before half-time through Carlos Augusto and Barella, but the damage to defensive accountability was already done. You are at home. You have sixty-six percent of the ball. You are the better side by every measure. And yet you are pegged back twice in the opening quarter of an hour by a team that managed one corner all night. One corner.

Udinese's Keinan Davis picked up a yellow card on forty-five minutes, which tells you they were not exactly running the show in terms of composure. And yet they were still in this game at half-time. That is unacceptable for a side of Inter's standards. Unacceptable.

The Second Half: Inter Did What They Should Have Done Earlier

Thuram put Inter ahead on fifty-seven minutes. Inter then managed the game from there with the kind of authority they should have shown from the first whistle. Pio Esposito's goal on sixty-seven minutes put some daylight between the sides. Bonny finished the job at seventy-nine.

The substitutions worked out well enough. Mkhitaryan picked up a yellow card for an argument at sixty minutes and was taken off on sixty-two, replaced by Curtis Jones. John Stones also came off at sixty-two, Benjamin Pavard coming on. Federico Dimarco came on at seventy after Inter had decided he was fit enough to play, despite injury data suggesting he had been out since September the sixth with an expected return date that had already passed. He featured, so make of that what you will.

Idrissa Gueye came on for Udinese in the second half and scored on ninety minutes. A consolation. By then it did not matter. But the fact that Udinese kept finding ways to get the ball in the net says something about how switched off Inter's defensive unit can be when they think the job is done.

The Numbers That Tell the Real Story

Inter's goalkeeper made two saves all night. Two. That sounds impressive until you remember Udinese scored three times. Their goalkeeper, by contrast, made seven saves trying to keep Udinese in it. The shot-stopping burden was entirely on the wrong end of the pitch for a side who controlled the match this completely.

Inter missed five big chances as well. Five. They created eight and converted three of them, which is a reasonable return, but the efficiency could be sharper. When you dominate a match this heavily, you should not leave five big chances on the table. That is not standards. That is waste.

Ten corners to one. Seventeen shots inside the box to five. The territorial dominance was absolute. So the three goals conceded are even harder to explain away. It is not as though Udinese were pressing high and creating sustained pressure. They had forty-nine attacks all night and seventeen dangerous ones. That is not a dangerous side. And yet Inter let them score three.

The Verdict

Inter win. Three points. The quality in this side when they are moving the ball and committing bodies forward is genuinely impressive. Five scorers from a twenty-seven shot haul against a side with no clean sheets in their last five Serie A matches is the kind of output a title-chasing team needs to produce.

But the defensive basics were not right tonight. You cannot concede three at home against opposition this limited and call it a clean performance. You just cannot. The attitude going forward was there. The desire to score was there. But the accountability at the back, the concentration when Udinese broke quickly in those opening minutes, that was missing.

Win the match. Tick. Keep the standards. Work to do. End of.

Informational only, not betting advice. 18+ ยท Past performance does not guarantee future results ยท BeGambleAware (UK): 0808 8020 133.