Joey Resink's failed €6m move from Groningen reveals how agents and intermediaries sabotage deals for profit
A promising transfer that would have sent Joey Resink from FC Groningen to Portuguese giants Benfica has collapsed amid allegations of financial manipulation and backroom dealing. The Dutch midfielder's agent has publicly accused unnamed parties of "dirty games" that derailed what should have been a straightforward €6 million move.
The breakdown offers a rare glimpse into football's transfer underworld, where agents, intermediaries and even club officials can profit more from failed deals than completed ones.
Resink, 25, had emerged as one of the Eredivisie's most consistent defensive midfielders over the past two seasons at Groningen. His performances caught the attention of Benfica's scouting network, who identified him as the perfect replacement for departing midfielder Florentino Luís.
The Portuguese champions saw in Resink exactly what they needed:
Initial negotiations progressed smoothly. Groningen accepted a €6 million fee plus €1.5 million in add-ons, while personal terms were agreed within days. Medical examinations were scheduled for late January.
Everything changed in the final 48 hours before the medical. Resink's agent noticed unusual activity around the deal. New intermediaries appeared claiming to represent various parties. Financial terms suddenly became complicated.
When there's so much money involved in transfers, dirty games emerge. People who have nothing to do with the player suddenly want their cut.
By the time Resink was due to fly to Lisbon, the deal had mysteriously stalled. Benfica withdrew their offer citing "irregularities in the negotiation process".
The Resink saga exemplifies how modern transfers can be sabotaged by parties seeking to maximise their financial gain. Industry sources suggest several mechanisms were at play in this collapsed deal.
Third-party agents often insert themselves into negotiations at the last minute, demanding commission payments that can total millions. In Resink's case, sources indicate at least three different intermediaries claimed to have mandates from either club.
These shadowy figures profit through:
The financial incentives for sabotaging transfers can exceed those for completing them. When a deal collapses, agents can:
Negotiate higher fees by creating artificial competition. Resink's representatives claim rival agents contacted Sporting CP and FC Porto to drive up their client's price, knowing Benfica would walk away.
Protect existing commission structures. Some intermediaries have long-term agreements with clubs that guarantee them percentages of all incoming transfers. New agents threatening these arrangements face obstruction.
The player becomes a commodity. His career, his dreams, they don't matter when millions are being divided behind closed doors.
Resink's experience reflects a growing trend in European football. Analysis of transfer data shows collapsed deals have increased by 35% since 2020, with financial disputes the leading cause.
Several transfers have followed similar patterns:
Each case involved last-minute complications, disputed agent fees, and players left in limbo while financial battles raged.
FIFA's attempts to regulate intermediaries have largely failed. The 2015 deregulation of agent licensing created a free-for-all where anyone can negotiate transfers. Over 2,000 intermediaries now operate in European football, many without formal qualifications or oversight.
National associations struggle to monitor cross-border deals. When transfers involve clubs from different countries, as with Groningen and Benfica, jurisdictional gaps allow bad actors to operate freely.
The human cost is significant. Resink remains at Groningen, his relationship with the club strained after mentally preparing for a move. His market value may decrease as other clubs question why the Benfica deal failed.
For bettors and analysts, these failures create uncertainty. Squad planning becomes impossible when transfers can collapse without warning. Groningen must now reintegrate a player who wanted to leave, while Benfica scrambles for alternatives with the window closing.
Resink faces an uncertain future. His contract at Groningen runs until 2025, but staying at a club after a failed transfer rarely works smoothly. January's window offers another opportunity, though Benfica have already signed an alternative in Leandro Barreiro.
The broader implications are troubling. Until football addresses the intermediary problem, promising transfers will continue collapsing in clouds of accusation and financial manipulation. For players like Resink, career-defining moves remain hostage to a system that prioritises profit over sporting ambition.
The beautiful game's ugly secret is that sometimes, the most profitable transfer is the one that never happens.
The €6 million transfer collapsed due to alleged 'dirty games' by intermediaries and financial manipulation in the final 48 hours. Multiple third-party agents inserted themselves into negotiations demanding commission payments.
The agreed transfer fee was €6 million plus €1.5 million in add-ons. Personal terms were agreed and medical examinations were scheduled before the deal collapsed.
Joey Resink is a 25-year-old defensive midfielder who plays for FC Groningen. He has an 89% pass completion rate in the Eredivisie and was targeted as a replacement for Florentino Luís.
Off The PitchFormer Benfica president Manuel Damásio has issued a stark ultimatum to current president Rui Costa, demanding he resign and call early elections if the club fails to win trophies next season. The intervention from the respected former leader (1994-1997) significantly escalates pressure on Costa's administration as Benfica struggle to compete with Sporting CP's domestic dominance.
Off The PitchBenfica's CFO Nuno Catarino reveals the club loses €15 million annually from Portugal's centralised TV rights system, calling it 'unacceptable' while exposing that some clubs voluntarily participate. The revelation highlights how Portuguese football's revenue distribution model handicaps its biggest clubs, threatening their ability to compete domestically and in Europe.
Intermediaries can profit by demanding retrospective payments for facilitating contact, threatening to leak information to rival clubs, and inserting themselves into negotiations at the last minute to claim commission payments.
SportSignals is an independent publication. Views expressed are our own.
